|
![]() ![]() Kaytek Analysis and Queries as regards the same Benefit From ![]() |
Kaytek's Consulting Director did a brief analysis of a leading European Intellectual Capital Rating and Measurement Tool. Some of his Queries ( to be considered in the context of limited knowledge with the vendor's tool framework and InTangible Capital Measurements in general ) and responses from the Tool Vendor are reproduced below. ![]() My understanding from reading your documents is that it is " All factors critical to an organization's future success that are not shown on the traditional balance sheet. " The term 'Intellectual Capital' perhaps have an excessively narrow scope in the Individual or Organizational Context. ![]() ![]() Does the framework capture the impact of Intellectual Capital on the same or vice-versa ? |
![]() We leave the past to others, such as accountants and financial rating institutions. ![]() It cannot be restricted only to organizations. As the Net enables more and more single individuals to work as one-man corporations, does your framework recognize the same ? ![]() ![]() (e.g. A person may have an IQ of 150. Can we say that an organization has an Intellectual Capital Rating or Measurement of a certain numerical value ? ) ![]() ![]() There are many figures that are not shown at all. I presume that your framework captures the remaining information. Is there any inbuilt link in your framework between the regulatory reporting systems of say a country like India and the 200 different Parameters of your framework ? ![]() Judging from the 200 and some parameters measured, none of them are successfully captured by any regulatory system that we have seen. ![]() Does your framework have an inbuilt mechanism to incorporate newer regulatory reporting elements or other environment changes ? |
![]() The accounting regulatory systems of the world will, in my opinion, never account for such things, since it is considered subjective. Our Tool objectifies the subjective features of organizations. ![]() ![]() The result of a rating might very well lead to a more detailed and in-depth analysis of such things as emotional and spiritual intelligence. ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|